-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Bryan Rasmussen writes: > Does anyone have a good overview of how well substitution groups and > redefines are supported in various processors. > Substitution groups are much simple to implement and use correctly than redefine, so I'd hope that interop was pretty good, but I have no concrete evidence about this, beyond the lack of email to this or other lists complaining about specific instances of problems. ht - -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCzO4WkjnJixAXWBoRAroQAJ91BaB/K+aXgQXIM3kcl1p1A4jE7gCfd5qM K9AMp/OYIPiPMNpKxQ1YVKo= =Y54/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----Received on Thursday, 7 July 2005 08:56:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:50 GMT