W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > January 2005

Re: Need help with Unique Particle Attribution Rule

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:09:04 +0000
To: Xan Gregg <xan.gregg@jmp.com>
Cc: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>, "'Vinotha Suntharalingam'" <vinos@carbontwelve.com>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <f5b7jmpz373.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk>

Xan Gregg <xan.gregg@jmp.com> writes:

> Not sure how I feel about that.  Seems dangerous to relax such a core
> constraint, but I can't find any real problem with it.  A hypothetical
> problem is some system that treats particles as primitives -- maybe a
> data mapping solution that maps A to an object and A+ to an array of
> objects, so it cares which particle A is in.  Does anybody do that?

The databinding work I did some time ago [1] did just that, yes . . .


[1] http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/mapping.html
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Friday, 7 January 2005 15:09:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:56:07 UTC