W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > August 2005

Re: Content Model for Restrictions

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 09:52:53 +0100
To: andrew.hodge@abs.gov.au
Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5bhdd7iz6i.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I can't comment about XML Spy -- I don't use it, and it gets many
reports of incompatibility with the spec.

I'm surprised about the regression wrt MSXML, but the fact of the
matter is that there are a number of _different_ schema validators in
different Microsoft products.

I'll try to get some MSoft people to look at this (but first, could
you please confirm that MSXML rejects _all_ your examples) -- as
Kasimir said, your first example is equivalent to a restriction of
anyType, and that should work for sure.

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDFB5okjnJixAXWBoRAi/xAJ9w2Bz65V44jraCH7INBp91WKkmrQCeIRGi
Rk0FgwxflZnGVvSMz0dlZUg=
=DImw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 30 August 2005 08:53:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:50 GMT