W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > August 2005

Content Model for Restrictions

From: <andrew.hodge@abs.gov.au>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 11:30:48 +1000
To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Cc: BPM_WDB@abs.gov.au
Message-ID: <OF7B5C8FD0.0ACC6531-ONCA25706C.0003ABED-CA25706C.00084655@abs.gov.au>

Hi,
    my name is Andrew Hodge and I am an IT Architecture consultant for the
Australian Bureau of Statistics.  We have recently found some issues with
our use of restrictions when we have moved to using a new suite of schema
validators.  We have a federated hierarchical schema model to support
Business Process Management.  Below are some simple test cases we have
constructed to illustrate the issues we have come across.  I had a look at
Schemas Part 0 and Part 1 but did not see any obvious guidance on these
issues.  I was wondering if anyone could point me to an information source
or comment on aspects of the content model for these types of restrictions.
Regards
Andrew Hodge
Australian Bureau of Statistics
email - andrew.hodge@abs.gov.au

This is an example of a case that has been working but now validation
fails.

<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:admin="
urn:abs.gov.au/BusinessAdministrationSystems" xmlns:tns="
urn:abs.gov.au/BusinessProcessManagement" targetNamespace="
urn:abs.gov.au/BusinessProcessManagement" elementFormDefault="qualified"
attributeFormDefault="unqualified">
      <xs:complexType name="TestEventPayload">
            <xs:sequence>
                  <xs:any namespace="##any" processContents="lax"
minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
            </xs:sequence>
      </xs:complexType>
      <xs:complexType name="RestTestEventPayload">
            <xs:complexContent>
                  <xs:restriction base="tns:TestEventPayload">
                        <xs:sequence>
                              <xs:element name="test1"/>
                           <xs:element name="test2"/>
                        </xs:sequence>
                  </xs:restriction>
            </xs:complexContent>
      </xs:complexType>
</xs:schema>plexType>
</xs:schema>

It now fails with "The content model of complex type tns:RestEventPayload
is not a vaild restriction of the content model tns:TestEventPayload"

The following also fails.

<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:admin="
urn:abs.gov.au/BusinessAdministrationSystems" xmlns:tns="
urn:abs.gov.au/BusinessProcessManagement" targetNamespace="
urn:abs.gov.au/BusinessProcessManagement" elementFormDefault="qualified"
attributeFormDefault="unqualified">
      <xs:complexType name="TestEventPayload">
            <xs:sequence    minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
                  <xs:any namespace="##any" processContents="lax"/>
            </xs:sequence>
      </xs:complexType>
      <xs:complexType name="RestTestEventPayload">
            <xs:complexContent>
                  <xs:restriction base="tns:TestEventPayload">
                        <xs:sequence>
                              <xs:element name="test1"/>
                           <xs:element name="test2"/>
                        </xs:sequence>
                  </xs:restriction>
            </xs:complexContent>
      </xs:complexType>
</xs:schema>plexType>
</xs:schema>

If I comment out element test2 the validation passes

<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:admin="
urn:abs.gov.au/BusinessAdministrationSystems" xmlns:tns="
urn:abs.gov.au/BusinessProcessManagement" targetNamespace="
urn:abs.gov.au/BusinessProcessManagement" elementFormDefault="qualified"
attributeFormDefault="unqualified">
      <xs:complexType name="TestEventPayload">
            <xs:sequence>
                  <xs:any namespace="##any" processContents="lax"
minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
            </xs:sequence>
      </xs:complexType>
      <xs:complexType name="RestTestEventPayload">
            <xs:complexContent>
                  <xs:restriction base="tns:TestEventPayload">
                        <xs:sequence>
                              <xs:element name="test1"/>
                           <!-- <xs:element name="test2"/>  -->
                        </xs:sequence>
                  </xs:restriction>
            </xs:complexContent>
      </xs:complexType>
</xs:schema>

Interestingly if I change the schema to using choice instead of sequence in
TestEventPayload then it passes.

<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:admin="
urn:abs.gov.au/BusinessAdministrationSystems" xmlns:tns="
urn:abs.gov.au/BusinessProcessManagement" targetNamespace="
urn:abs.gov.au/BusinessProcessManagement" elementFormDefault="qualified"
attributeFormDefault="unqualified">
      <xs:complexType name="TestEventPayload">
            <xs:choice  minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
                  <xs:any namespace="##any" processContents="lax"/>
            </xs:choice>
      </xs:complexType>
      <xs:complexType name="RestTestEventPayload">
            <xs:complexContent>
                  <xs:restriction base="tns:TestEventPayload">
                        <xs:sequence>
                              <xs:element name="test1"/>
                              <xs:element name="test2"/>

                        </xs:sequence>
                  </xs:restriction>
            </xs:complexContent>
      </xs:complexType>
</xs:schema>

But it appears that this is not processed consistently in a hierarchical
schema structure.






-----------------------------------------------
ABS Web Site:  www.abs.gov.au
Received on Monday, 29 August 2005 07:17:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:50 GMT