W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > October 2004

Union of Union with facets

From: Zafar Abbas <zafara@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 12:11:45 -0700
Message-ID: <563BD3496D37BB4B9F4E8F896A58F2B3032BD08E@RED-MSG-50.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>

I have a question about the section in the Xml Schema structures spec
about Union Schema Component (under 3.14.2). It mentions that the actual
value of member type definitions is formed by replacing a union type
definition in the explicit members with members of their respective
member type definitions.

But it doesn't mention anything about the case where a restriction of a
union (with some facets, e.g. enumeration) is a member type of another
union. How should the facets be applied to the parent union while
resolving the child union to its simple type definitions?

Zafar Abbas
Received on Monday, 18 October 2004 19:12:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:56:06 UTC