W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > November 2004

AW: Validation problem with user-defined derived complex types

From: Huditsch Roman <Roman.Huditsch@lexisnexis.at>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:25:00 +0100
Message-ID: <AA7BAD89B2B0C746A26452F44939F1E340705E@LNGVIEEX1.orac.local>
To: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>

Hmm, I just validated it via the W3C Schema Validator and MSXML, too and didn't get an error either. 
So I suppose that there is really something very strange happening inside XML Spy 2005.
Thank you very much!

Wbr,
Roman

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Michael Kay [mailto:mike@saxonica.com]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. November 2004 13:07
> An: Huditsch Roman
> Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
> Betreff: RE: Validation problem with user-defined derived complex types
> 
> I can't see anything wrong with it, but that doesn't necessarily mean
> there
> isn't anything wrong with it... Can you reduce the problem to a form where
> you can supply a complete schema that can be tested in other tools?
> 
> Michael Kay
> http://www.saxonica.com/
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org
> > [mailto:xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Huditsch Roman
> > Sent: 23 November 2004 11:57
> > To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
> > Subject: AW: Validation problem with user-defined derived
> > complex types
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Can someone give me a hint, please, if the reported error
> > message (see mail below) is an XML Spy bug or is just a
> > stupid mistake by myself?
> >
> > Thank you very much in advance!
> >
> > Wbr,
> > Roman
> >
> > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > > Von: Huditsch Roman
> > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. November 2004 12:34
> > > An: 'xmlschema-dev@w3.org'
> > > Betreff: Validation problem with user-defined derived complex types
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I just tested the new version of XMLSpy 2005 (which I use with Saxon
> > > 8.1.1) and encountered that it reports a validation error for my XML
> > > Schema:
> > >
> > > "The content model of complexType "fussnoteType" must be a
> > valid extension
> > > of its Base Type Definition's content model"
> > >
> > > Unfortunately, I can't figure out what this error message
> > is trying to
> > > tell me...
> > >
> > > The corresponding Schema parts are:
> > >
> > > <xs:complexType name="fussnoteType" mixed="true">
> > > 	<xs:complexContent mixed="true">
> > > 		<xs:extension base="markedTextType">
> > > 			<xs:attribute name="nummer">
> > > 				<xs:simpleType>
> > > 					<xs:restriction
> > base="xs:string"/>
> > > 				</xs:simpleType>
> > > 			</xs:attribute>
> > > 			<xs:attribute name="id" use="optional">
> > > 				<xs:simpleType>
> > > 					<xs:restriction base="xs:ID">
> > > 						<xs:pattern
> > value="fn-?\d+"/>
> > > 					</xs:restriction>
> > > 				</xs:simpleType>
> > > 			</xs:attribute>
> > > 			<xs:attributeGroup ref="herausgeberAttributes"/>
> > > 		</xs:extension>
> > > 	</xs:complexContent>
> > > </xs:complexType>
> > >
> > > Which is derived from
> > >
> > > <xs:complexType name="markedTextType" mixed="true">
> > > 	<xs:complexContent mixed="true">
> > > 		<xs:restriction base="markedTextVersionType">
> > > 			<xs:choice minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
> > > 				<xs:element name="klammer_eckig"
> > > type="markedTextType" minOccurs="0"/>
> > > 					<xs:element name="fett"
> > > type="markedTextType" minOccurs="0"/>
> > > 					<xs:element name="kursiv"
> > > type="markedTextType" minOccurs="0"/>
> > > 					<xs:element name="hoch"
> > > type="markedTextType" minOccurs="0"/>
> > > 					<xs:element name="tief"
> > > type="markedTextType" minOccurs="0"/>
> > > 					<xs:element name="fussnote"
> > > type="fussnoteType" minOccurs="0"/>
> > > 					<xs:element ref="fussnote_ref"
> > > minOccurs="0"/>
> > > 					<xs:element ref="satz"
> > minOccurs="0"/>
> > > 					<xs:element ref="zeilenumbruch"
> > > minOccurs="0"/>
> > > 					<xs:element ref="fuellzeichen"
> > > minOccurs="0"/>
> > > 					<xs:element ref="verweis_int"
> > > minOccurs="0"/>
> > > 					<xs:element ref="verweis_ext"
> > > minOccurs="0"/>
> > > 					<xs:element ref="verweis_url"
> > > minOccurs="0"/>
> > > 					<!-- Added 2004-10-19
> > by Roman Huditsch -->
> > > 				</xs:choice>
> > > 			</xs:restriction>
> > > 		</xs:complexContent>
> > > </xs:complexType>
> > >
> > > Which is furthermore derived from
> > >
> > > <xs:complexType name="markedTextVersionType" mixed="true">
> > > 	<xs:choice minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
> > > 		<xs:element name="klammer_eckig"
> > type="markedTextVersionType"
> > > minOccurs="0"/>
> > > 		<xs:element name="fett" type="markedTextVersionType"
> > > minOccurs="0"/>
> > > 		<xs:element name="kursiv" type="markedTextVersionType"
> > > minOccurs="0"/>
> > > 		<xs:element name="hoch" type="markedTextVersionType"
> > > minOccurs="0"/>
> > > 		<xs:element name="tief" type="markedTextVersionType"
> > > minOccurs="0"/>
> > > 		<xs:element name="fussnote" type="fussnoteType"
> > > minOccurs="0"/>
> > > 		<xs:element ref="fussnote_ref" minOccurs="0"/>
> > > 		<xs:element ref="version" minOccurs="0"/>
> > > 		<xs:element ref="satz" minOccurs="0"/>
> > > 		<xs:element ref="zeilenumbruch" minOccurs="0"/>
> > > 		<xs:element ref="fuellzeichen" minOccurs="0"/>
> > > 		<xs:element ref="verweis_int" minOccurs="0"/>
> > > 		<xs:element ref="verweis_ext" minOccurs="0"/>
> > > 		<xs:element ref="verweis_url" minOccurs="0"/>
> > > 	</xs:choice>
> > > </xs:complexType>
> > >
> > > It is interesting that validating this schema in another
> > view of XMLSpy
> > > other than "text" is giving me no error....
> > > Therefore I am a little bit mixed up, if there is a problem
> > with my Schema
> > > or with the validation process....
> > >
> > > Thank you very much for your help in advance.
> > >
> > > wbr,
> > > Roman
> >
> >
> > **********************************************************************
> > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> > are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
> > the system manager.
> >
> > This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
> > MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
> >
> > www.mimesweeper.com
> > **********************************************************************
> >
> >
> >
Received on Tuesday, 23 November 2004 12:25:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 23:40:23 UTC