- From: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 15:58:00 -0000
- To: "'Kasimier Buchcik'" <kbuchcik@4commerce.de>
- Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
> > > > You seem to be assuming B1 and B2 contain copies of the > components in C. If > > the components retain their identity, I don't think it's a > problem: if a > > component in B2 includes a reference to a component in C, > that reference > > will be satisfied, because the component will exist in A, > whether it reached > > A via B1 or B2. (It gets more complicated, of course, with chameleon > > includes). > > Just to make this more visual for me: > > - B1 has it's original components, call them B1.orig > - B1 has copies of components of C, call them B1.C components > - B1.orig components have properties with B1.C components as values I don't think you should ever need to copy the components (except for chameleons). If you don't copy the components, I think your problem disappears. Or have I misunderstood? Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Received on Friday, 5 November 2004 15:58:04 UTC