W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > May 2004

RE: keyref with empty sets

From: Michael Kay <mhk@mhk.me.uk>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 19:00:40 +0100
To: "'Henry S. Thompson'" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Cc: "'Nigel Hardy'" <nwh@aber.ac.uk>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20040528180117.2D2F9A1991@frink.w3.org>


> > In other words it only makes sense to define a keyref on either
> > the same element as the key, or an ancestor of it.
> 
> Correct.  And his schema does that -- the key is defined on User,
> which occurs within Admin.  

Ah, yes, I misread it.

Michael Kay

Received on Friday, 28 May 2004 14:01:17 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Henry S. Thompson: "Re: keyref with empty sets"
Previous message: Henry S. Thompson: "Re: keyref with empty sets"
In reply to: Henry S. Thompson: "Re: keyref with empty sets"
Next in thread: Henry S. Thompson: "Re: keyref with empty sets"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:44 GMT