W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > March 2004

Re: pervasiveness of a redefine

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 08:55:16 +0100
To: "James Taylor" <JTaylor@nextance.com>
Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <f5b4qs6u5uj.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk>

"James Taylor" <JTaylor@nextance.com> writes:

> Thanks for the clarifications.  One follow-up question: if redefines are
> chained, that is, File D again redefines the Employee type from file
> Company.xsd, should this again redefine all occurrences of the Employee
> type?  In other words, there's always one and only one type definition
> for a given type with the last/outermost redefine "winning".

Yes.

ht
-- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Tuesday, 30 March 2004 02:55:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 23:40:23 UTC