W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > June 2004

Re: Occurrence constraints

From: Jeff Sonstein <jeffs@ariadne.iz.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 18:25:47 -0400
Message-Id: <F637714A-B5AC-11D8-BF97-000A958744C8@ariadne.iz.net>
To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org

> The outcome of the vote was 5-0 that it _is_ ok to have 
> minOccurs=maxOccurs=0!

anybody ever read the poem "Jabberwocky"??
my wife was using it in a Linguistics class the other night
as an example of something
grammatically and syntactically "legal"
but not necessarily meaningful


Jeff Sonstein, Assistant Professor
Department of Information Technology
Rochester Institute of Technology
IT Dept Webspace:                       http://www.it.rit.edu/~jxs/
Experimental Server:              http://streamer.rit.edu/~jeffs/
xVRML Project:                                  http://www.xvrml.net/
Public Key:                    http://ariadne.iz.net/~jeffs/jeffs.asc

"The most important thing in the programming
   language is the name. A language will not succeed
   without a good name. I have recently invented a
   very good name and now I am looking for a suitable

- D. E. Knuth, 1967 -
Received on Thursday, 3 June 2004 18:25:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:56:05 UTC