W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > June 2004

Re: Occurrence constraints

From: Jeff Sonstein <jeffs@ariadne.iz.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 18:25:47 -0400
Message-Id: <F637714A-B5AC-11D8-BF97-000A958744C8@ariadne.iz.net>
To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org

> The outcome of the vote was 5-0 that it _is_ ok to have 
> minOccurs=maxOccurs=0!

anybody ever read the poem "Jabberwocky"??
my wife was using it in a Linguistics class the other night
as an example of something
grammatically and syntactically "legal"
but not necessarily meaningful
<grin/>

jeffs

--
Jeff Sonstein, Assistant Professor
Department of Information Technology
Rochester Institute of Technology
==============================================
IT Dept Webspace:                       http://www.it.rit.edu/~jxs/
Experimental Server:              http://streamer.rit.edu/~jeffs/
xVRML Project:                                  http://www.xvrml.net/
Public Key:                    http://ariadne.iz.net/~jeffs/jeffs.asc

"The most important thing in the programming
   language is the name. A language will not succeed
   without a good name. I have recently invented a
   very good name and now I am looking for a suitable
   language."

- D. E. Knuth, 1967 -
Received on Thursday, 3 June 2004 18:25:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:44 GMT