W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > August 2004

RE: redefine, xs:group and UPA

From: Biron,Paul V <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 16:10:27 -0700
Message-Id: <8E9F0028F5955844899380433C60E39902A0D28F@cscrdemsg001.crdc.kp.org>
To: "'xmlschema-dev@w3.org'" <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Biron,Paul V 
> Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 4:05 PM
> To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
> Subject: redefine, xs:group and UPA
> xsv v2.7 and xerces v2.6.2 disagree on the legality of the 
> attached schema documents.  xerces thinks they are alright 
> but xsv thinks there is a UPA violation (because of the 
> wildcard in group.xsd).
> I believe that xsv is correct but would like other opinions.  
> xerces complains if the wildcard appears "inlined" but not 
> when it occurs because of a group reference...which is where 
> I think it's bug is.  Can anyone confirm this?

never mind...pilot error.  Both processors report group.xsd as ambiguous on its own and both report redefine.xsd as just fine...when I was testing against xsv I incorrectly used group.xsd instead of redefine.xsd.

Sorry for the waste of bandwidth.

Received on Wednesday, 4 August 2004 19:13:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:56:05 UTC