W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > March 2003

Re: Successive restriction of enumerated content in complex types

From: Simon Cox <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 19:53:37 +0800
Message-ID: <002401c2f38e$5790acc0$0c15000a@arrc.csiro.au>
To: "Hugh Wallis" <hugh_wallis@hyperion.com>, "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>

This is a known bug in Spy.
It only shows up in the text view, not the "schema" view (or vice versa).

I reported it first more than a year ago, and then again about 3 months ago.
They agree it is a bug and have promised to fix it in forthcoming release
...

----- Original Message -----
From: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
To: "Hugh Wallis" <hugh_wallis@hyperion.com>
Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 5:48 PM
Subject: Re: Successive restriction of enumerated content in complex types


>
> "Hugh Wallis" <hugh_wallis@hyperion.com> writes:
>
> > XML-Spy chokes on this by highlighting
> >
> > base="dt:accountTypeItemType"
> >
> > and giving the error message "simpleContent cannot have a base that is a
> > complexType with complexContent" which makes no sense to me because
> > accountTypeItemType does not have complexContent.
> >
> > A JAXP 1.2/Xerces 2 validator says this is valid XML Schema
> >
> > Is it?
>
> Looks OK to me.
>
> ht
> --
>   Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of
Edinburgh
>                       Half-time member of W3C Team
>      2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
>     Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
>      URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
>  [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged
spam]
>
Received on Wednesday, 26 March 2003 06:55:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:36 GMT