W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > January 2003

Re: Opinion of UML-to-XML Schema?

From: Dave Carlson <dcarlson@ontogenics.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 09:31:47 -0700
Message-ID: <037c01c2c946$4011b070$0100a8c0@Beethoven>
To: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>, "Case,David W." <dwc@mitre.org>

Hi Roger,

I've been working on this topic for more than three years, so am also
interested in the comments of others.  See my site, with a dozen papers and two
recent newsletters on this topic: http://XMLmodeling.com

Also, in addition to generating XSD from UML, I'm am finding very good results
from reverse engineering UML models and class diagrams from data-oriented XML
schemas.  See the UML diagrams in Annex C of this week's Universal Business
Language (UBL) release, which were automatically reverse engineered using my
hyperModel tool:

Per the comments from Tony Coates in a followup message, it's a bit difficult
to use existing UML tools to design schemas similar to what can be
hand-crafted.  However, I am working on a hybrid tool that will make this
easier.  The UML metamodel is used for the underlying representation and
storage, but the user interface makes it easy to edit the model in terms of XSD

  Dave Carlson

----- Original Message -----
From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>
To: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>; "Costello,Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>;
"Case,David W." <dwc@mitre.org>
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:53 AM
Subject: Opinion of UML-to-XML Schema?

> Hi Folks,
> Does anyone have experience with using the UML-to-XML Schema tools?
> That is, does anyone have experience with using those tools which
> automatically generate XML Schemas from a UML model?  I am interested in
> hearing your experience - good or bad.  /Roger
Received on Friday, 31 January 2003 11:44:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:55:59 UTC