W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > January 2003

Re: infinite loop

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 10 Jan 2003 16:01:42 +0000
To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
Cc: "Jeff Rafter" <jeffrafter@defined.net>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5b4r8h9eop.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk>

Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> writes:

> Hi Jeff,
> 
>   "The following constraints define relations appealed to elsewhere in
>    this specification."
> 
> In other words, the only SCC that applies to all particles is the
> Particle Correct SCC. The other SCCs in that section just act as
> definitions that are used elsewhere in the spec. So, for example, when
> a constraint wants to say "if the particle is emptiable then..." then
> it can refer to the common definition of what it means for a particle
> to be emptiable by pointing to the Particle Emptiable SCC.

Jeni's right.  It would be clearer if the opening para said "All
particles must satisfy the following constraint." instead of
"constraints", I agree.  That's a boilerplate sentence originally used
in all 3.?.6 sections.

ht
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2002, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Friday, 10 January 2003 11:01:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:35 GMT