W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > February 2003

Re: validation issue for extensible schema - XMLSpy issue ?

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 14 Feb 2003 14:51:28 +0000
To: "Paul Kiel" <paul@hr-xml.org>
Cc: "Laurent Le Meur" <laurent.lemeur@afp.com>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <f5bheb66hlb.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk>

"Paul Kiel" <paul@hr-xml.org> writes:

> I have found that the processContent feature is inconsitently implemented in
> various products, so we ended up removing it from our ANY definitions.  It
> was easier to predict what a parser would do without it than with it.

This is of course a serious issue -- I hope, as with all other
inter-op problems, you notified the vendors of the problem -- this is
the only way such things get fixed.

ht
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                      Half-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Friday, 14 February 2003 09:51:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:36 GMT