- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 14 Feb 2003 14:51:28 +0000
- To: "Paul Kiel" <paul@hr-xml.org>
- Cc: "Laurent Le Meur" <laurent.lemeur@afp.com>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
"Paul Kiel" <paul@hr-xml.org> writes:
> I have found that the processContent feature is inconsitently implemented in
> various products, so we ended up removing it from our ANY definitions. It
> was easier to predict what a parser would do without it than with it.
This is of course a serious issue -- I hope, as with all other
inter-op problems, you notified the vendors of the problem -- this is
the only way such things get fixed.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Friday, 14 February 2003 09:51:19 UTC