W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > February 2003

RE: use of xs:annotation outside of schema

From: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 08:48:37 -0800
Message-ID: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F804B7C8D6@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>, "Xan Gregg" <xan@tibco.com>
Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>

Not this again. So how are implementations supposed to validate the <xs:annotation> elements? 

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Henry S. Thompson [mailto:ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk] 
	Sent: Thu 2/13/2003 6:34 AM 
	To: Xan Gregg 
	Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org 
	Subject: Re: use of xs:annotation outside of schema
	
	


	Xan Gregg <xan@tibco.com> writes:
	
	> Is it OK to re-use something like xs:annotation for my own schemas?  That
	> is, I want to allow annotation of elements in my instance documents, and it
	> seems xs:annotation provides just what I want.
	
	Sounds OK to me.  I can imagine implementations which wouldn't do the
	right thing, but I think they'd be wrong.
	
	ht
	--
	  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
	                      Half-time member of W3C Team
	     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
	                     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
	 [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
	
	
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2003 11:49:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:36 GMT