W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > April 2003

Re: [xml-dev] PSVI Question

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 23 Apr 2003 09:54:13 +0100
To: Navid <silencer2020@yahoo.ca>
Cc: XML-DEV <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>, XML-SCHEMA-DEV <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <f5bel3t8uh6.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk>

Navid <silencer2020@yahoo.ca> writes:

> > Just that the XML representation of a component, in
> > this case an
> > attribute declaration, is not the cmoponent itself. 
> > In this case the
> > mapping rules say that such a representation
> > corresponds to an
> > attribute declaration with {type definition} set to
> > xs:anySimpleType.
> > So the component _does_ have a type definition, and
> > it will get used
> > at validation time, and so Xerces and XSV are
> > correct.
> 
> Hi Henry,
> 
> Thanks for your reply.  Can you give me an example of
> how clause (2) of 'Attribute Locally Valid (3.2.4)'
> can fail?

If it's allowed by an attribute wildcard with {process contents} *lax*.

ht
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                      Half-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2003 04:54:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:36 GMT