RE: inconsistent union of patterns

Thank you very much for your help!  I am truly appreciative!

Will Crosbie
Quality Assurance Analyst
will.crosbie@arch.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Anli Shundi [mailto:ashundi@tibco.com]
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2003 11:23 AM
To: Will Crosbie; xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Subject: RE: inconsistent union of patterns


Well you have the top-levels two-letters for all the countries
http://www.iana.org/cctld/cctld-whois.htm

Then a few more such as .aero, .edu, .mil, to .pro at
http://www.icann.org/tlds/

Anli Shundi 
TIBCO Software Inc.
www.tibco.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Will Crosbie [mailto:Will.Crosbie@arch.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 18, 2003 10:36 AM
> To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
> Subject: Re: inconsistent union of patterns
> 
> 
> 
> Hi.  I was reading over the conversation thread and have come 
> across what I consider to be a related byproduct of the 
> conversation that you are having here.  I am trying to find 
> documentation that identifies valid extensions on an email address.
> 
> Of course, there is no denying that .com/org/net and many 
> other three character extensions are valid email extensions.  
> But are there any valid one or two character extensions in 
> existence?  More importantly, is there any documentation on 
> the web that you are aware of that might support any 
> conclusion that you have?
> 
> I'm hoping that I'm coming to the right set of brains on 
> this.  If possible, please reply via email to 
> will.crosbie@arch.com with any information that you might 
> have.  And thank you ever so kindly for your time.
> 
> Will Crosbie
> Quality Assurance Analyst
> will.crosbie@arch.com
> 
> 
>

Received on Friday, 18 April 2003 12:34:04 UTC