W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > April 2003

RE: Validating documents with ISO/IEC 15938-1 chapter 6 schema

From: Alejandro López <alexl@salleurl.edu>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 11:55:04 +0200
To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <FIECJLLBICMKDIHHDNFGKEGBCAAA.alexl@salleurl.edu>
Dear Henry,
	You can find in the attachment a sample MPEG7 document I think it could be
OK and the schema. I am using XML Spy version 5 rel 2. The error I have is:
	This file is not valid:
	No content model available for validation (possibly empty DTD/Schema).
	Thank you very much,
	Alejandro.

-----Mensaje original-----
De: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk [mailto:ht@inf.ed.ac.uk]En nombre de Henry S.
Thompson
Enviado el: martes, 15 de abril de 2003 11:40
Para: Alejandro López
CC: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Asunto: Re: Validating documents with ISO/IEC 15938-1 chapter 6 schema


Alejandro López <alexl@salleURL.edu> writes:

> Dear All,
> 	I am involved in a research project on MPEG-7 and I would like to
generate
> descriptions according to the schema defined in chapter 6 of ISO/IEC
15938-1
> since I need to send a complete MPEG-7 description on MPEG-2 by means of
> Access Units.
> 	The problem is that I am not able to validate my MPEG-7 descriptions
> according to that schema, I have tried to do it with
> http://ana.ctr.columbia.edu/ but it didn´t work.
> 	Has anybody created XML documents validated with this schema?
> 	I send in the attachment the schema extracted from the standard.

The schema document you attached seems fine.  Do you have a sample
MPEG-7 document you believe to be OK which doesn't validate?  Which
validator are you using?  What error messages does it give?

ht
--
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                      Half-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged
spam]


Received on Tuesday, 15 April 2003 05:57:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:36 GMT