W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > October 2002

RE: Are these functionalities often used?

From: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:16:29 -0700
Message-ID: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F804104DA5@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Michael" <listes.marchegay@wanadoo.fr>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>

 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael [mailto:listes.marchegay@wanadoo.fr] 
> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 4:12 AM
> To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
> 
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> I want to implement an XSD tool, and in a first version I 
> would like to drop functionalities that are not really used 
> in real life. That's why I want to have advice about which 
> features could be dropped in the first
> version:
> 
> - any (processContents? namespace?)
> - anyAttribute (processContents? namespace?)

I see these a lot. 

> - keys

Not as much as the others but still frequently used. 

> - NOTATION

Never seen anyone use this. 

> - redefine

Rarely used. 

> - final and block attributes
> - abstract complexTypes

Used infrequently but not as rarely as redefine.  


-- 
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
Whenever you set out to do something, something else must be done first.


This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. 

>  
> 
Received on Monday, 21 October 2002 07:17:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:34 GMT