W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > October 2002

RE: A complex type cannot be a restriction of a simpleType ??

From: Mark Feblowitz <mfeblowitz@frictionless.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 13:49:35 -0400
Message-ID: <4DBDB4044ABED31183C000508BA0E97F040AC07E@fcpostal.frictionless.com>
To: "'Simon.Cox@csiro.au'" <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>, ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
Cc: ted.toth@vincera.com, xmlschema-dev@w3.org

Nope - I'm using 5 and it's still there.

Mark

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Simon.Cox@csiro.au [mailto:Simon.Cox@csiro.au] 
Sent:	Tuesday, October 08, 2002 5:03 AM
To:	Mark Feblowitz; ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
Cc:	ted.toth@vincera.com; xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Subject:	RE: A complex type cannot be a restriction of a simpleType
??

I reported this to Altova at least six months ago.  
Hasn't it been corrected in XML Spy 5?  (I'm still using 4.4).  

_____
[This mail represents part of a discussion of work in progress 
and should not be used for any purpose without my permission.] 
_____
Simon.Cox@csiro.au  CSIRO Exploration & Mining
26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington WA 6151
PO Box 1130, Bentley WA 6102  AUSTRALIA
T: +61 (8) 6436 8639  F: +61 (8) 6436 8555  C: +61 (4) 0330 2672
http://www.csiro.au/page.asp?type=resume&id=CoxSimon

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Feblowitz [mailto:mfeblowitz@frictionless.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 8 October 2002 1:22 AM
> To: 'ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk'
> Cc: Ted Toth; xmlschema-dev@w3.org
> Subject: RE: A complex type cannot be a restriction of a simpleType ??
> 
> 
> 
> It certainly looks that way. I wonder why there's confusion.
> 
> 
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk [mailto:ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk] 
> Sent:	Monday, October 07, 2002 1:12 PM
> To:	Mark Feblowitz
> Cc:	Ted Toth; xmlschema-dev@w3.org
> Subject:	Re: A complex type cannot be a restriction of a 
> simpleType
> ??
> 
> Mark Feblowitz <mfeblowitz@frictionless.com> writes:
> 
> > If that's the case, then the XML Spy folks need to be 
> contacted, too.
> While
> > Spy does validate the schema in "Schema View" mode, in text 
> view mode it
> > gives the following error:
> > 
> > Schema error - undefined schema component "base" encountered -
> simpleContent
> > can not have a base that is a complexType with complexContent.
> 
> But this is wrong -- element is a complexType with _simple_ content,
> right?
> 
> ht
> -- 
>   Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, 
> University of Edinburgh
>           W3C Fellow 1999--2002, part-time member of W3C Team
>      2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 
> 131 650-4440
> 	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
> 		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
>  [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without 
> it is forged
> spam]
> Confidentiality Notice: This message, including any 
> attachments, is intended
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed 
> and may contain
> information that is privileged and confidential.  If you have 
> received this
> email in error, please delete it.  Any disclosure, copying or 
> distribution
> of this message is strictly prohibited.  Thank you.
> 
Confidentiality Notice: This message, including any attachments, is intended
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed and may contain
information that is privileged and confidential.  If you have received this
email in error, please delete it.  Any disclosure, copying or distribution
of this message is strictly prohibited.  Thank you.
Received on Tuesday, 8 October 2002 13:50:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:34 GMT