W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > October 2002

Re: Shouldn't this restriction be invalid?

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 03 Oct 2002 09:23:53 +0100
To: Eddie Robertsson <erobertsson@allette.com.au>
Cc: Steven Bird <sb@ldc.upenn.edu>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org, Gary Simons <Gary_Simons@sil.org>
Message-ID: <f5b8z1gj5gm.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk>

Eddie Robertsson <erobertsson@allette.com.au> writes:

<snip/>

> My guess would be because the spec isn't clear on this issue. If there
> is an errata out that fix this problem then validators will probably
> change accordingly.

There is indeed a contradiction, and that's been acknowledged by the
WG, and resolved in favour of allowing the derivation [1].  I'm behind
on drafting the official erratum, sorry.

ht

[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-rec-comments.html#pfiSimpleContent
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2002, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Thursday, 3 October 2002 04:24:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:34 GMT