W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > March 2002

RE: Is anySimpleType a real type?

From: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 12:12:15 -0800
Message-ID: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E055715D3@red-msg-06.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Mark Feblowitz" <mfeblowitz@frictionless.com>, <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>, <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
If you have issues with MSXML, you can send me an email detailing the
problem along with a repro. 

Thanks. 

-- 
THINGS TO DO IF I BECOME AN EVIL OVERLORD #5
The artifact which is the source of my power will not be kept on the
Mountain
of Despair beyond the River of Fire guarded by the Dragons of Eternity.
It 
will be in my safe-deposit box. The same applies to the object which is
my 
one weakness.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Feblowitz [mailto:mfeblowitz@frictionless.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 6:38 AM
> To: 'ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk'; Simon.Cox@csiro.au
> Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Is anySimpleType a real type?
> 
> 
> Yes - and it seems to work just fine in all parsers except 
> MSXML, which doesn't recognize xs:anySimpleType as a defined type. 
> 
> I'm not sure where/how to report it as a bug. It has forced 
> us into some much-less-than-elegant representations.
> 
> Mark
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------
> ----
>  
> Mark Feblowitz                                   [t] 617.715.7231
> Frictionless Commerce Incorporated     [f] 617.495.0188 
> XML Architect                                     [e]
> mfeblowitz@frictionless.com
> 400 Technology Square, 9th Floor 
> Cambridge, MA 02139 
> www.frictionless.com  
>  
> 
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk [mailto:ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk] 
> Sent:	Tuesday, March 12, 2002 4:29 AM
> To:	Simon.Cox@csiro.au
> Cc:	xmlschema-dev@w3.org
> Subject:	Re: Is anySimpleType a real type?
> 
> Simon.Cox@csiro.au writes:
> 
> > Can anySimpleType be used in element declarations?
> > Or is it just a notional type whose name cannot be exposed in a 
> > schema!
> > 
> > e.g. I have the following line in a schema document:
> > 
> > <xs:element name="_ScalarValue" type="xs:anySimpleType" 
> > abstract="true" substitutionGroup="gml:_Value"/>
> 
> Perfectly OK.  Clarification forthcoming on this and related 
> issues from the WG, see the Issues list [1], issue R-54.
> 
> ht
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-rec-comments#pfiur-type
> -- 
>   Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, 
> University of Edinburgh
>           W3C Fellow 1999--2002, part-time member of W3C Team
>      2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 
> 131 650-4440
> 	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
> 		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
>  [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without 
> it is forged spam]
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2002 15:12:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:29 GMT