W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > March 2002

Re: Choice

From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 19:22:59 +0100
Message-ID: <3C890183.6080207@dyomedea.com>
To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:
> I stand  corrected!  Then again, I'm not looking forward to running Prolog 
> in my SOAP pipelines.

You were the one who had said that a schema language needed to be 
declarative :)) and Prolog is the best example of a complete general 
purpose declarative language...

Furthermore, having tried both I can insure you that Prolog is easier to 
learn or to teach than W3C XML Schema ;=) ...

Eric
-- 
See you in Seattle.
                                        http://knowledgetechnologies.net/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
http://xsltunit.org      http://4xt.org           http://examplotron.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 8 March 2002 13:23:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:29 GMT