W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > June 2002

Re: Recursion and validation

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 28 Jun 2002 09:02:53 +0100
To: Ian Stokes-Rees <ijs@decisionsoft.com>
Cc: James Kavanagh <jkavanagh@adeptra.com>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5bd6ubx236.fsf@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>

Ian Stokes-Rees <ijs@decisionsoft.com> writes:

> The only thing I could suggest is that "patternsType" contains something
> of type "integerType", which means you could have a structure which
> looked like:
> <integer>
>   <patterns>
>     <integer>
>       <patterns>
>         <integer>
>           ...
> (if "integer" was a child of "patterns").  What I do not know is whether
> or not the XSDL spec allows this, since "patterns" is a choice inside
> "integerType", meaning it may not exist.

This is a good candidate for an FAQ.  Schemas with such recursive
types _are_ OK.  If they don't have choice or optionality, they may be 
unsatisfiable with finite documents, of course :-).

  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2002, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Friday, 28 June 2002 04:02:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:55:57 UTC