- From: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 13:14:04 -0700
- To: "Mark Feblowitz" <mfeblowitz@frictionless.com>, "Calvin Smith" <calvins@SIMS.Berkeley.EDU>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Feblowitz [mailto:mfeblowitz@frictionless.com] > Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 1:03 PM > To: 'Calvin Smith'; xmlschema-dev@w3.org > Subject: RE: restricting anySimpleType in complexType definition > > > > In case I implied otherwise, there was a discussion in March > about whether xs:anySimpleType was legal. It appears to be: > > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlschema-dev/2002Mar/0087.html The W3C XML Schema WG met, Henry lost, film at 11. Details at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200206/msg00446.html and http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200206/msg00483.html4 -- PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM All that glitters has a high refractive index. This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Received on Monday, 17 June 2002 16:14:37 UTC