yes I did mean union, and as you point out the attribute should have been in the field xpath (it was a contived example) thanks Jeni, Colin -----Original Message----- From: Jeni Tennison [mailto:jeni@jenitennison.com] Sent: 14 June 2002 10:31 To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org; Colin Mackenzie Subject: Re: use of "or" in keyref selector Hi Colin, > Can anyone confirm whether or not it is valid to specify an "or" for > a selector in a keyref. You mean union ("or" in XPath is 'or', "union" is '|'). And yes, it is valid. The BNF for selectors is: [1] Selector ::= Path ( '|' Path )* [2] Path ::= ('.//')? Step ( '/' Step )* [3] Step ::= '.' | NameTest [4] NameTest ::= QName | '*' | NCName ':' '*' As you can see, the selector can be made up of several paths, separated by the union operator ('|'). The BNF for fields is the same except that the Paths can point to attributes: [5] Path ::= ('.//')? ( Step '/' )* ( Step | '@' NameTest ) See http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#coss-identity-constraint. Cheers, Jeni --- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com/Received on Friday, 14 June 2002 05:40:30 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:31 GMT