W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > June 2002

RE: Use of List Types in Schema

From: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@microsoft.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 23:50:32 -0700
Message-ID: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E06621CB1@red-msg-06.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Dwivedi , Ajay Kumar" <AjayKumar.Dwivedi@Dresdner-Bank.com>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>

This is probably the case. We just recently received clarification from a member of the W3C XML Schema WG[0] about duplicate values in lists. I shall pass the names of the affected test cases along to our W3C QA rep. 
 
[0] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlschema-dev/2002Feb/0205.html

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Dwivedi , Ajay Kumar [mailto:AjayKumar.Dwivedi@Dresdner-Bank.com] 
	Sent: Sun 6/9/2002 10:37 PM 
	To: Dare Obasanjo; xmlschema-dev@w3.org 
	Cc: 
	Subject: RE: Use of List Types in Schema
	
	

	Hi Dare,
	        I asked this question because there are 4 test cases in
	http://www.w3.org/XML/2001/05/xmlschema-test-collection/result-ms-complexTyp
	e.htm
	which disallow duplicate values:
	        ctA014
	        ctA015
	        ctA023
	        ctA024
	
	        So, I'll assume these tests are wrong ;)
	
	Thanks,
	Ajay
	
	> -----Original Message-----
	> From: Dare Obasanjo [mailto:dareo@microsoft.com]
	> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:28 AM
	> To: Dwivedi , Ajay Kumar; xmlschema-dev@w3.org
	> Subject: RE: Use of List Types in Schema
	>
	>
	>
	> Yes. Nothing in the W3C XML Schema recommendation disallows it.
	>
	>       -----Original Message-----
	>       From: Dwivedi , Ajay Kumar
	> [mailto:AjayKumar.Dwivedi@dresdner-bank.com]
	>       Sent: Sat 6/8/2002 10:09 AM
	>       To: 'xmlschema-dev@w3.org'
	>       Cc:
	>       Subject: Use of List Types in Schema
	>      
	>      
	>
	>
	>       Hi all,
	>               Are duplicate values allowed in list types.
	>       For example, is the value of "restriction restriction" valid for
	>       finalDefault attribute of schema.
	>      
	>       Thanks in Advance,
	>       Ajay
	>      
	>      
	>
	
Received on Monday, 10 June 2002 02:51:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:31 GMT