- From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@scenicsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:24:39 -0700
- To: "'Biron,Paul V'" <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org>
- Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
> Here's a real simple > case (artificial, > as it may be...I'm sure that given a few moments we could all > come up with a > "useful" example) that illustrates the difficulty: > > <xs:complexType name='base'> > <xs:sequence> > <xs:element name='a' minOccurs='0'> > <xs:complexType> > ... > </xs:complexType> > </xs:element> > <xs:element name='b'> > <xs:complexType> > <xs:sequence> > <xs:element name='a' > minOccurs='0'> > <xs:complexType> > ... > > </xs:complexType> > </xs:element> > </xs:sequence> > </xs:complexType> > </xs:element> > </xs:sequence> > </xs:complexType> > > If I write a restriction of 'base' that only mentions the element > 'a'...which model does it refer to? I thought XPaths were suggested as an alternative in this case. Why was that rejected? It's used for keydefs.
Received on Wednesday, 10 July 2002 13:25:25 UTC