W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > January 2002

Unnamed type in <schema>

From: <sylvain.devillers@philips.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 16:54:57 +0100
To: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF37D43324.0395A151-ON41256B43.00571900@diamond.philips.com>
Apparently, the "name" attribute of a type definition is optional,
even if the type is defined under <schema>.
However, in this case, the type definition would be pointless since it
could not be referred to by an element declaration.

Is this behaviour normal ?

Thank you,

Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2002 10:55:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:55:54 UTC