W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > January 2002

Re: complexType derivation method

From: Eddie Robertsson <eddie@allette.com.au>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 09:20:37 +1100
Message-ID: <3C3E13B5.136EB3F9@allette.com.au>
To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
CC: boriero <aboriero@hoc.elet.polimi.it>, XSD <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
> > As I read the spec this [type named '3'] should also be valid
> > although none of the validators I tested with could validate this
> > type correctly.
> I demur -- XSV is happy with the attached, which is 1, 2 and 3 with
> minor typos and the 'mixed' bug fixed.

My mistake. I actually had a typo in the schema I tested with so infact all the
validators I tested with can validate this (XSV, XML Spy 4.2 and MSXML4 RTM).
Sorry for the confusion.

Received on Thursday, 10 January 2002 17:11:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:26 GMT