W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > December 2002

Re: Doubt about validation

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 20 Dec 2002 10:32:37 +0000
To: Paul Warren <pdw@decisionsoft.com>
Cc: Santino Troiani <santino.troiani@next.it>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5b3cot2d6i.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk>

Paul Warren <pdw@decisionsoft.com> writes:

> On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 09:05, Santino Troiani wrote:


> > Why your parser doesn't report any error ?
> > Can you give me any suggestion to solve the problem ?
> The problem here is that an item called "Text" can be validated against
> either of Text definitions within the choice.  The schema validating
> parser needs to associate each element with a single definition within
> the schema at parse time.  As it stands, it is ambiguous which
> definition a "Text" element would be validated against.

Paul's analysis is correct on all counts.

Your content model as written is (t|(t,d)|d).  To cover the same
possibilities in an acceptable way, write the schema equivalent of

Also, if you install XSV on your own machine, you can use the -i flag
to test a (collection of) schema document(s) thoroughly, as if they
were being used in validation.

  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2002, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Friday, 20 December 2002 05:32:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:55:59 UTC