"Morris Matsa" <mmatsa@us.ibm.com> writes: > We've been having discussions about which of these are legal in a schema, > based on inferences in various parts of the spec which might contradict > each other. > > Which of the four are legal? > > <xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"> > <xsd:element name="one" type="xsd:anySimpleType" /> > <xsd:element name="two" type="xsd:anyType" /> > <xsd:attribute name="three" type="xsd:anySimpleType" /> > <xsd:attribute name="four" type="xsd:anyType" /> > </xsd:schema> > > SQC XSV > one ok ok > two ok ok > three ok ok > four ok bad [1] Forthcoming errata will clarify this -- XSV is (will be) correct. ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh W3C Fellow 1999--2002, part-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]Received on Thursday, 5 December 2002 03:30:35 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:35 GMT