W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > April 2002

Re: union of a union legal?

From: Li Liang <lliang88@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 18:02:24 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <20020402230204.56884.qmail@web14504.mail.yahoo.com>
To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Can definitions of union types in schema _documents_
include references to itself? I think not. Does the
spec address it somewhere? Thanks.


>This is correct.  Definitions of union types in
schema _documents_ may
>include references to other union type definitions in
the value of
>their 'memberTypes' attribute; simple type definition
_components_ of
>variety union may include only atomic and list type
>_components_ in their [member type definitions]

Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2002 03:50:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:55:56 UTC