W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > April 2002

Re: union of a union legal?

From: Li Liang <lliang88@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 18:02:24 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <20020402230204.56884.qmail@web14504.mail.yahoo.com>
To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Can definitions of union types in schema _documents_
include references to itself? I think not. Does the
spec address it somewhere? Thanks.

Li

>This is correct.  Definitions of union types in
schema _documents_ may
>include references to other union type definitions in
the value of
>their 'memberTypes' attribute; simple type definition
_components_ of
>variety union may include only atomic and list type
definition
>_components_ in their [member type definitions]
property.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2002 03:50:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:30 GMT