- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 17:39:36 +0200
- To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com> writes:
>
>><invalid char='2' code='cvc-identity-constraint.2.3.2' line='11'
>>resource='key-keyref-wrong.xml'>no key in {None}:key for 2</invalid>
>>
>
> That will take some work to fix -- as implemented, the collision means
> that at the level of the <doc>, there _is_ no key in {None}:key. It's
> possible to leave a trace so the error can be different. . .
Maybe just replace "no key in" by "no unique key in" for the common
case, then.
Otherwise, as far as I am concerned, keep it very low priority.
It's a detail and this scenario will anyhow probably not be very common...
Thanks
Eric
> ht
>
--
See you in Scottsdale, Arizona.
http://xmlconnections.com/xml/xmlfall2001/speakers.asp#evandervlist
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
http://xsltunit.org http://4xt.org http://examplotron.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 24 September 2001 11:39:34 UTC