- From: KAZUMI Saito <ksaito@jp.fujitsu.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 21:51:55 +0900
- To: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
- Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Thanks for your suggestion.
In message "Re: Derivation from simple content to complex contnet vice versa",
Henry S. Thompson wrote...
>These are intended to be ruled out by the relevant Schema Component
>Constraints [1], namely Derivation Valid (Extension) and Derivation
>Valid (Restriction, Complex). Please explain if you can see a way
>that they're not covered.
It is so complex for me, but now cleary I understood, thank you. About
the derivation from complex content to simple content, implicitly
ruled out as "whose own {content type} must be a simple type definition".
-----
KAZUMI Saito FUJITSU Ltd.
Received on Friday, 14 September 2001 08:52:17 UTC