Ooops, sorry, just found it: Within the [children], each <simpleType> must have a <restriction> among its [children] and each <complexType> must have a restriction or extension among its grand-[children] the ·actual value· of whose base [attribute] must be the same as the ·actual value· of its own name attribute plus target namespace; Eric Eric van der Vlist wrote: > Probably a weird question, but I haven't found anything in the rec nor > in the schema for schema which would disallow using a derivation by list > when redefining a simple type. > > Since a derivation by list is changing the semantic of the simple type, > I was wondering if this is really possible per the rec and if it is, > what's the logic behind. > > Thanks for your answers/comments! > > Eric > -- Rendez-vous ą Paris pour le Forum XML. http://www.technoforum.fr/Pages/forumXML01/index.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com http://xsltunit.org http://4xt.org http://examplotron.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2001 12:11:02 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:35 GMT