"Yan Leshinsky" <yanl@microsoft.com> writes: > Wat about related case with substitution groups. Are following schemas > valid? > > <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"> > <xs:element name="A"/> > <xs:element name="B" substitutionGroup="A" type="xs:string"/> > </xs:schema> Yes > <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"> > <xs:element name="A" type="xs:anyType"/> > <xs:element name="B" substitutionGroup="A" type="xs:string"/> > </xs:schema> Yes. > <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"> > <xs:element name="A"/> > <xs:element name="B" substitutionGroup="A"> > <xs:complexType> > ... > </xs:complexType> > </xs:element> > </xs:schema> Yes > <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"> > <xs:element name="A" type="xs:anyType"/> > <xs:element name="B" substitutionGroup="A"> > <xs:complexType> > ... > </xs:complexType> > </xs:element> > </xs:schema> Yes. The first and third are identical to the second and fourth at the component level. ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/Received on Monday, 12 November 2001 04:07:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:35 GMT