W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > November 2001

RE: Identifying absent behavior

From: Chan, Philip <Philip.Chan@rbccm.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 10:37:36 -0500
Message-ID: <A2AB950B23E5D411B23C00805FA7BBC80195EEEA@TOTOMB04>
To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
It seems to me that there is no difference between <t></t> and <t/>
according to schema definition.  Let me know if I am wrong.  If you just
want to prevent empty tag, you could use minOccurs='1'.

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Garrett Steed [SMTP:gmsteed@seasllc.com]
> Sent:	Wednesday, November 07, 2001 9:54 AM
> To:	xmlschema-dev@w3.org
> Subject:	Re: Identifying absent behavior
> 
> Thank you for the reply:
> 
> I would like to specifically disallow this:
> Absent c element: <t><t> <t/>
> When parsing a document there must be a string with in the <t/> tags.
> Sorry if the previous email was not clear.
> 
> Thanks Again 
> Garrett
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2001 10:38:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:35 GMT