W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > May 2001

Re: <group> element's attributes

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 16 May 2001 17:45:42 +0100
To: "Tom Gaven" <tom.gaven@xmls.com>
Cc: "Morris Matsa" <mmatsa@us.ibm.com>, "Eddie Robertsson" <eddie@allette.com.au>, "XSD" <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <f5bae4ddyyx.fsf@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
"Tom Gaven" <tom.gaven@xmls.com> writes:

> This makes sense, but what would happen if the group ref had maxOccurs,
> but no minOccurs?
> Would the minOccurs on the group's sequence be combined with the
> maxOccurs on the group ref? 

Whatever else we do, _that_ option is quite high cost.  It's a least
misleading to say "the group ref and . . . no minOccurs", in that the
<group> element's 'minOccurs' attribute is declared with a default
(1), so whether there's a 'minOccurs' there in the character sequence
or not, there is one there in the Infoset.  Removing that default just 
in order to address this corner case does not seem to me like a good
idea.

ht
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2001 13:31:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:20 GMT