W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > March 2001

Re: Mixing schemaLocation and noNamespaceSchemaLocation?

From: Ian Stokes-Rees <ijs@decisionsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 13:29:45 +0100
Message-ID: <3AC47C39.D053208C@decisionsoft.com>
To: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
CC: "'xmlschema-dev@w3.org'" <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
> If you did this for namespace-less schema, then you really should allow it for namespaced-schemas for symetry.  I might have two schemas that each cover a separate partition of one namespace.

> However, trying to decide if two schemas are complementary or duplicative would be a pain.  I think the one namespace == one schema resource (in a document) is the best approach.  You could still partition your schemas, but you would have to create another schema that imported both BookCatalogue and Reviewer.

Isn't the proper way of thinking about this that there is only one
schema per namespace and that there are multiple schema documents
describing that namespace?

-- 
Ian Stokes-Rees, Engineering Manager  DecisionSoft Ltd.
Telephone: +44-1865-203192            http://www.decisionsoft.com
Received on Friday, 30 March 2001 07:28:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:20 GMT