W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > March 2001

RE: What to do with CryptoBinary?

From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 09:12:53 -0500
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010327091142.02ec4b48@rpcp.mit.edu>
To: "Brian LaMacchia" <bal@microsoft.com>
Cc: <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>, <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
At 19:28 3/26/2001 -0800, Brian LaMacchia wrote:
>CryptoBinary and base64Binary are not exactly equivalent -- there are
>further restrictions on a CryptoBinary because it is a representation of
>a single bignum.

Good point! Good enough then, thank you Brian and Noah.


__
Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature
W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Tuesday, 27 March 2001 09:13:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:20 GMT