W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > March 2001

Re: Proposed UML Interest Group

From: Asir Vedamuthu <asirv@webmethods.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 14:05:32 -0500 (EST)
To: David Ezell <David_E3@Verifone.Com>
cc: "'xmlschema-dev@w3.org'" <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>, "'www-rdf-interest@w3.org'" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, "'Dan Connolly'" <connolly@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10103091321351.7362-100000@nexus.webmethods.com>

> First,
> UML could be useful as a formalism which can be applied
> to help verify infosets involved.  

I am not sure how you would do this. I would love to learn more

> Second, UML can be
> an educational tool, using diagrams to help clarify exactly
> what is being proposed, both in terms of content and behavior,
> and thereby improve understandability

Is a great idea, indeed. I would say that we should do the *minimal* to
clarify exactly what is being proposed and *no more*

> Please speak up if you think that
> such an interest group is a good idea

You have my support


Regards,

Asir S Vedamuthu

webMethods, Inc.
703-460-2513 or asirv@webmethods.com
http://www.webmethods.com/
Received on Friday, 9 March 2001 14:06:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:20 GMT