W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > June 2001

Re: Mixing schemaLocation and noNamespaceSchemaLocation?

From: Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:29:17 +0100
Message-ID: <019201c0faf5$6f6e8760$0300a8c0@greyarea>
To: <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>, <francis@redrice.com>
Cc: <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>, <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>, <ijs@decisionsoft.com>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>

----- Original Message -----
From: <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>
To: <francis@redrice.com>
Cc: <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>; <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>;
<ijs@decisionsoft.com>; <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 7:33 PM
Subject: Re: Mixing schemaLocation and noNamespaceSchemaLocation?

>         <p:e a='2' xlmns:p="URIP"/>
> Of course there's a sense in which the attribute a is indirectly in
> namespace URIP, but per the NS rec only element "e" is actually said to be
> "in the namespace".  Why should an unqualified local element be any
> different?

Noah, I'm having a feeling of 'deja vu'. I had this argument over on
XML-DEV[1] a few weeks ago...


[1] http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200105/msg00493.html
Received on Friday, 22 June 2001 04:31:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:55:52 UTC