W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > June 2001

Re: none

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 15 Jun 2001 14:54:17 +0100
To: "Ravindra Jain" <ravindra@ltp.soft.net>
Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <f5bzob9u9va.fsf@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
"Ravindra Jain" <ravindra@ltp.soft.net> writes:

> Hi All,
> 
> According to XML Schema Part 1 : Structures (Section 3.4.2 XML
> Representation of ComplexType Definitions)
> the definition of a complexContent is as follows :
> 
> <complexContent
>   id = ID
>   mixed = boolean
>   {any attributes with non-schema namespace . . .}>
>   Content: (annotation?, (restriction | extension))
> </complexContent>
> 
> <restriction
>   base = QName
>   id = ID
>   {any attributes with non-schema namespace . . .}>
>   Content: (annotation?, (group | all | choice | sequence)?, ((attribute |
> attributeGroup)*, anyAttribute?))
> </restriction>
> 
> <extension
>   base = QName
>   id = ID
>   {any attributes with non-schema namespace . . .}>
>   Content: (annotation?, ((group | all | choice | sequence)?, ((attribute |
> attributeGroup)*, anyAttribute?)))
> </extension>
> 
> Here, in the above definition, the content of <extension> and <restriction>
> both looks similar (except one pair of braces in extension's content
> definition)
> Why there is an extra set of brackets in extension ?
> Does it have some special significance ?

Stylesheet artefact, sorry.  No significance.

ht
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Friday, 15 June 2001 09:54:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:21 GMT