- From: Ian Stokes-Rees <ijs@decisionsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 15:27:41 +0100
- To: Holger.Joukl@LBBW.de
- CC: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
As I said in the original post, all the "schema examples" were in "pseudo XSDL" -- a short hand which conveys the concept without the bulk of proper XSDL. They are guaranteed not to be XSDL conformant. Regards, Ian PS - please consider that indiscriminate confidentiality statements in a signature may actually _reduce_ the strength of your legal position, besides the fact that sigs of that length are considered fairly poor netiquette. Holger.Joukl@LBBW.de wrote: > > Hi, > one (beginnerīs :-) question: > Are you allowed to put in the <attribute name=...> in element content? > > -- snip------------------------------------------------------------ > <group name="fooStyleX"> > <element name="foo"> > <attribute name="some_attr"> > </element> > </group> > > or similar with the <group...> as element content: > > --snip---------------------------- > <element name="doc"> > <element name="a"> > <group ref="fooStyleX" /> > </element> > > Or are you just leaving out some anonymous complexType "wrappers" > around this content? (Maybe thatīs what you mean with "pseudo XSDL") > > As I understand the Rec, element content is restricted to: > > "(annotation?, ((simpleType | complexType)?, (unique | key | keyref)*))" > > Greetings > Holger -- Ian Stokes-Rees DecisionSoft Ltd. Telephone: +44-1865-203192 http://www.decisionsoft.com
Received on Friday, 6 July 2001 10:26:05 UTC