> >The "no changing the infoset" design appeals to me because > >it seems simpler, but I gather it doesn't meet the needs > >of folks that want to do XML Protocols, Java bindings, > >and the like. > > No, you only have to create a layer on top of traditionals APIs. > Relaxer does the job by creating Java programs from descriptions in > RELAX. For example, Relaxer supports default values by embedding > them in Java classes. How does this differ than the creation of a PSVI? DaveReceived on Thursday, 5 July 2001 09:20:41 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 16 March 2009 11:13:17 GMT