Jeff Rafter wrote: > > [snip] > > > and to consider the datatype as ordered (might be useful for XPath 2.0). > > Good point-- does this mean that an optional Time Zone Qualifier should be > added as well as in the current date types? It would be nice, but I don't see how we could do it. We wouldn't be able to keep the hack of using a decimal datatype with a Time Zone Qualifier within the field itself and if we added it as an attribute, we would have inconsistent results when sorting values with different time zones. Or have I missed something ? Thanks Eric > > Regards, > Jeff Rafter > Defined Systems > http://www.defined.net > XML Development and Developer Web Hosting -- See you at XTech in San Diego. http://conferences.oreillynet.com/cs/os2001/view/e_spkr/790 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com http://xsltunit.org http://4xt.org http://examplotron.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------Received on Wednesday, 4 July 2001 11:30:40 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 16 March 2009 11:13:17 GMT