W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlschema-dev@w3.org > December 2000

RE: SOM

From: Arnaud Blandin <blandin@intalio.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 13:50:40 -0800
To: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Message-ID: <EPEKKOODJFPGIAOKHAEEGELACHAA.blandin@intalio.com>
Hi all,

Just to point out that Castor XML uses its own Schema Object Model (http://castor.exolab.org) 
perhaps it can interest you.
But I believe that providing a generic solution for implementing Schema Object Model could
really be useful.

Regards
Arnaud

-> -----Original Message-----
-> From: xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org
-> [mailto:xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Steffen Stundzig
-> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 2:17 AM
-> To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
-> Cc: steffen@stundzig.de
-> Subject: SOM
-> 
-> 
-> Hi all,
-> 
-> I'm a developer on the OpenSource SchemoX project at infozone-group.
-> Inside SchemoX I must develop an Java object model that represents 
-> an complete XML Schema declaration. 
-> 
-> >From my developers point of view, I love the idea to use a
-> standardized object model of a XML Schema as like DOM for XML.
-> 
-> But I can't found any standard for this at the w3c or any other 
-> gremium.
-> 
-> I've found several object models in the Oracle XMLSchema Validator, 
-> in SxDP, in XML Instance from extensiblity and now additional in 
-> SchemoX. And I'm sure that's not all.
-> 
-> So all this developers must reinvent the same thing. Study the 
-> complete XMLSchema CR, build an object oriented model and 
-> finally implement it. Horrible.
-> 
-> Let's try to establish a standard for this. A object model that
-> represents a XML Schema. Or have I overlooked something?
-> 
-> Is somebody interested in it?
-> 
-> 
-> Best Regards
-> 	Steffen...
-> 
-> 
-> -- 
-> ______________________________________________________________________
-> Steffen Stundzig                            mailto:steffen@smb-tec.com
-> SMB GmbH                                        http://www.smb-tec.com
-> 
-> 
Received on Thursday, 14 December 2000 16:52:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 11 January 2011 00:14:19 GMT