Re: XML Schema = obfuscation RE: Is this valid?

MarkH@i2.co.uk writes:

> i understand henry's points and fully support his work. and i'm also aware
> that my comments are coming to the "debate" a long time after it has all
> transpired. so i'm not really criticising where we are or why we got here. 

Understood.

> it just occurred to me that the end result is not quite as great as i'd
> hoped that it might be.
> 
> to expand slightly... XML Schema is a text based format, but is effectively
> inaccessible without complex tools, which is a significant downside.

Not sure I understand what you mean by complex tools.  Any DTD-aware XML
editor, of which there are now lots, including lots for free, makes
editing an XML Schema easier than editing a DTD, in my experience.

ht
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/

Received on Monday, 4 December 2000 06:45:16 UTC